Resources for advocates, legal professionals, businesses, individuals and parties to court proceedings.
Joint editing changes the examination task. A text may combine the author's original wording, an editor's revisions, another person's quotation and a standard template. Before comparing texts, it is important to understand precisely which passages are disputed and which changes are documented.
Read the guide →
A short phrase may seem recognisable, but a familiar word or typo does not establish its author. The scope for authorship examination depends on how much…
Read article →Court-commissioned and pre-trial examination of text authorship, linguistic features, style, anonymous messages and disputed publications.
Read →Why the expert compares a pattern of linguistic features, genre, style and stable writing characteristics, rather than individual words.
Read →Posts, comments, messengers, email, reviews, complaints and the digital context of a disputed text.
Read →When meaning, linguistic form, communicative purpose and context need to be examined together with authorship.
Read →Free, conditionally free and experimental texts; comparability of genre, length and time of creation.
Read →Examples of appropriate questions for court proceedings, an advocate, a specialist opinion and an expert report review.
Read →How to check the methodology, samples, completeness of the examination, scope of expertise and validity of the findings.
Read →